What I am particularly puzzled over, though, is under what circumstances Outlook/Exchange would add optional attendees when she hadn't explicitly added any herself. It is possible to add people and rooms to your Outlook reservation without resending the invitation to people who have already received it earlier. Live events can do it though I'm not sure if it's a good fit for your scenario(s). If you mean inside the actual meeting, no. There's an awful lot of things in the mix here and plenty of noise to filter out. Re: Hiding Meeting Attendees When sending the invite, yes, if you do it via Outlook and use the BCC field. Sometimes as required attendees but more often as optional ones. Her issue is that, after she has sent meeting updates and received responses, if she then opens the meeting again to amend and send further updates, she frequently finds that some of the external contacts have been added again as duplicate attendees. She is a delegate of some of the people she is inviting (some of which are Mac Entourage users) and I suspect that some of the external contacts are delegates for some of the other external contacts. Some of the attendees are external contacts with (contact) entries in the GAL.
#Outlook show meeting attendees series#
She manages a recurring series of meetings whose instances and attendees change frequently. She is using Outlook 2003 with Exchange 2000 as a back end. Right click the appointment and select Invite Attendees. Outlook>Meeting>Scheduling Assistant>All Attendees. A user at a client I am working for has a strange problem with Outlook meeting requests. Though these steps use Outlook 2016, the steps are comparable for earlier versions. Verify your account to enable IT peers to see that you are a professional.